CASE STUDIES

    REPRESENTATIVE ENGAGEMENT NARRATIVES ANONYMIZED. ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE WORK.

    The case studies below are representative narratives drawn from TANDM client engagements. They are anonymized specific company names, founder names, and identifying details are not disclosed for client confidentiality reasons. The financial figures, operational changes, and transaction outcomes described are accurate to the underlying engagements. They are illustrative of the kind of work TANDM does and the outcomes that result, not literal case histories of any single named client.

    Specific client testimonials and named case studies are available under NDA for serious-prospect conversations through the Ground Check engagement.

    CASE STUDY ONE

    A performance marketing firm went from $3.5M / 4x to $6.3M+ at 8x

    Original valuation range

    $1.7M–$2.2M

    Transaction value at exit

    ~$7M

    A performance marketing firm went from $3.5M / 4x to

    The business was a founder-led performance shop in the $3.5M revenue range, running paid social and search for direct-to-consumer ecommerce brands. The founder had built the business through personal pitch leadership and direct senior involvement in every major account. Two clients made up nearly 40% of revenue between them. Retention was good but never precisely calculated. The financial reporting was clean for tax purposes but had not been restated for transaction. An initial conversation with a multi-channel performance platform had stalled at the diligence question stage, with the acquirer indicating an opening multiple in the 4x range below what the founder had hoped for.

    The engagement ran 22 months under the Exit-Ready Full Program. The senior leadership distribution work converted the business from founder-as-the-team-of-one-senior-strategist into a structure with three named senior leads across paid social, search, and creative-performance integration, each running their function with formal authority and demonstrated independent outcomes. The client concentration work deliberately reduced the top client from 22% to 14% of revenue over 14 months through new client acquisition and the planned offboarding of one oversized account. Retention discipline was installed with cohort tracking, NRR calculation, and renewal rate measurement the business moved from "retention is good" to "112% NRR with 18-month average tenure across the retainer book." AI integration was documented through a full AI Operations Playbook covering optimization workflows, creative iteration, audience research, and reporting; the proprietary AI Asset Registry organized the prompts, custom GPTs, and automation patterns that had been built informally over years.

    At month 22, the business was at $4.2M revenue, $880K EBITDA, with documented operational maturity. The transaction closed at 8x EBITDA to a multi-channel performance platform. The founder's retention was 18 months with no earnout tied to retention metrics clean transaction economics rather than the multi-year retention earnout that would have been required without the operational preparation.

    Total enterprise value at exit: approximately $7M. Approximate enterprise value if the business had transacted at month zero in its original condition: $1.7M–$2.2M. The operational preparation produced roughly $5M+ in additional enterprise value on the same business.

    CASE STUDY TWO

    A regional law firm restructured for a $4M partner buy-in at 5.5x

    Pre-engagement stall

    2 years

    Buy-in closing valuation

    $4M @ 5.5x

    A regional law firm restructured for a $4M partner buy-in at

    The firm was a regional commercial litigation practice in the $4M revenue range with three named partners one founding partner who built the firm and two younger partners who had been with the firm for 8–12 years. The founding partner originated 60% of the firm's matters through personal relationships built over 30 years. The associates were capable but had never run matters end-to-end without senior partner involvement. Financial reporting was for tax filing only, with substantial partner compensation, family member payroll, and discretionary expense complications that made normalized EBITDA difficult to calculate. The two younger partners had expressed interest in buying out the founding partner over a structured timeline, but the gap between what they were willing to pay and what the founding partner felt the firm was worth had stalled the conversation for two years.

    The engagement ran 19 months as an Exit-Ready Full Program calibrated to internal partner transition rather than external sale. Key workstreams: financial restatement with normalized partner compensation and clean three-year reviewed financials produced a defensible EBITDA baseline; originator distribution work systematically transferred client relationships from the founding partner to the two younger partners, with documented client retention under the new relationship architecture before the formal transition; matter management process documentation built the operational infrastructure that produced consistent matter handling regardless of which partner originated; AI integration documented research and document review workflows that had been informally implemented across the practice.

    The buy-in closed at a defensible $4M valuation (5.5x normalized EBITDA), structured as a five-year buyout with retained equity for the founding partner during a defined transition. The founding partner remained involved at a senior advisor level for three years, then fully exited. The firm subsequently grew to $5.2M revenue under the two younger partners' leadership, validating the operational maturity that the engagement had built.

    The case demonstrates that the Exit-Ready Method™ applies to internal partner transitions as well as external transactions the underlying operational work is the same, with different framing for the endpoint.

    CASE STUDY THREE

    A four-location dental group sold to a DSO at 7.5x EBITDA

    Pre-engagement valuation

    $8M–$10M

    Transaction value at exit

    ~$18M @ 7.5x

    A four-location dental group sold to a DSO at

    The group was a founder-led dental group with four locations and $9M in revenue, run by a founding dentist who was still personally producing 55% of clinical revenue at the home location. Hygiene revenue was at 19% of total meaningfully below the 28% benchmark for premium DSO acquisition. Two associate dentists had left in the prior 18 months. The four locations operated to inconsistent operational standards because each location manager had built informal processes over years. The founding dentist had been approached by two DSO platforms and one regional consolidator in the prior 36 months; none of the conversations had progressed past initial diligence.

    The engagement ran 24 months under the Exit-Ready Full Program calibrated to DSO acquisition specifically. Key workstreams: founding dentist clinical hour reduction from 35 hours per week to 12 hours per week over 18 months, with deliberate associate elevation and patient relationship transfer to absorb the capacity; hygiene program redesign across all four locations including hygienist productivity benchmarking, scheduling optimization, hygiene-driven treatment acceptance protocols, and dedicated hygiene leadership hygiene revenue grew from 19% to 27% of total; multi-location operational standardization with documented SOPs across scheduling, treatment planning, insurance verification, and patient communication; associate retention work including comp restructuring to top-quartile, formal partnership track for two senior associates, and retention agreements structured to survive a DSO acquisition.

    At month 24, the group was at $9.6M revenue, $2.4M EBITDA. The transaction closed to a DSO platform at 7.5x EBITDA approximately $18M enterprise value. The founding dentist remained at the home location for an 18-month transition working 8 clinical hours per week, with no clinical productivity earnout. The acquired group has continued to grow under DSO operational structure, validating that the standardization work was real rather than cosmetic.

    Approximate enterprise value if the group had transacted at month zero: $8M–$10M. The operational preparation produced roughly $8M+ in additional enterprise value on the same group.

    WHAT WE WILL AND WON'T SHARE

    Specific client testimonials are confidential until the client publicly engages on them.

    TANDM does not publish named client case studies, testimonials, or specific transaction details without the client's explicit written permission. Most of our clients prefer confidentiality on the operational preparation work they don't want competitors or potential acquirers to know they're preparing for transaction, and they don't want clients or employees to draw conclusions from public TANDM association that might or might not be accurate.

    For serious-prospect conversations, specific named case studies and direct client references are available under NDA through the Ground Check engagement. The anonymized narratives above are representative of the kind of work TANDM does and the outcomes that result.

    Same framework. Different execution.

    Schedule a confidential conversation to discuss how the Exit-Ready Method™ would apply to your specific situation.